🔗 Share this article

Thhese days present a very unique phenomenon: the first-ever US procession of the caretakers. They vary in their skills and attributes, but they all possess the identical objective – to prevent an Israeli violation, or even devastation, of Gaza’s fragile peace agreement. Since the war ended, there have been few days without at least one of Donald Trump’s representatives on the ground. Only recently saw the arrival of Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, a senator and a political figure – all arriving to execute their duties.

The Israeli government occupies their time. In only a few days it initiated a wave of attacks in Gaza after the loss of two Israeli military soldiers – resulting, as reported, in scores of Palestinian injuries. Multiple officials called for a resumption of the fighting, and the Knesset passed a preliminary resolution to annex the occupied territories. The US stance was somewhere ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

Yet in various respects, the American government seems more concentrated on preserving the present, tense period of the peace than on advancing to the next: the rebuilding of Gaza. Concerning this, it looks the US may have aspirations but little concrete plans.

For now, it is unknown at what point the proposed international administrative entity will actually begin operating, and the identical is true for the proposed security force – or even the identity of its personnel. On Tuesday, Vance declared the US would not dictate the structure of the international force on Israel. But if the prime minister's cabinet persists to dismiss multiple options – as it acted with the Ankara's offer lately – what happens then? There is also the contrary question: who will decide whether the units supported by Israel are even prepared in the assignment?

The issue of the timeframe it will need to disarm the militant group is equally unclear. “The aim in the administration is that the international security force is going to now take charge in neutralizing Hamas,” stated Vance this week. “That’s may need a while.” Trump further emphasized the ambiguity, declaring in an conversation on Sunday that there is no “hard” schedule for Hamas to disarm. So, in theory, the unidentified participants of this still unformed global contingent could deploy to Gaza while Hamas militants still hold power. Would they be confronting a administration or a insurgent group? Among the many of the questions emerging. Others might ask what the verdict will be for average Palestinians under current conditions, with Hamas carrying on to focus on its own political rivals and dissidents.

Recent developments have afresh highlighted the omissions of Israeli reporting on each side of the Gaza frontier. Each outlet seeks to examine every possible aspect of the group's violations of the peace. And, in general, the fact that the organization has been stalling the return of the bodies of deceased Israeli captives has taken over the coverage.

On the other hand, attention of non-combatant deaths in the region resulting from Israeli strikes has garnered minimal notice – or none. Consider the Israeli counter actions after a recent southern Gaza incident, in which a pair of troops were killed. While Gaza’s sources claimed dozens of fatalities, Israeli television commentators questioned the “limited reaction,” which targeted only facilities.

This is not new. Over the past few days, the press agency charged Israel of violating the ceasefire with Hamas multiple occasions since the ceasefire began, resulting in the loss of dozens of Palestinians and harming another many more. The claim seemed unimportant to most Israeli news programmes – it was simply absent. Even information that 11 members of a local family were lost their lives by Israeli forces a few days ago.

Gaza’s emergency services stated the family had been trying to go back to their dwelling in the a Gaza City area of the city when the bus they were in was targeted for reportedly passing the “yellow line” that marks territories under Israeli military authority. That yellow line is not visible to the naked eye and is visible only on charts and in authoritative records – sometimes not available to ordinary people in the territory.

Even that occurrence scarcely received a note in Israeli news outlets. One source covered it shortly on its digital site, citing an IDF representative who said that after a questionable transport was detected, troops discharged cautionary rounds towards it, “but the transport kept to move toward the troops in a fashion that caused an immediate risk to them. The forces shot to remove the threat, in compliance with the agreement.” No injuries were claimed.

Given such perspective, it is understandable a lot of Israelis believe the group alone is to responsible for infringing the truce. This perception threatens prompting appeals for a more aggressive approach in Gaza.

Sooner or later – perhaps sooner than expected – it will no longer be adequate for US envoys to act as supervisors, instructing the Israeli government what not to do. They will {have to|need